« Noted and quoted, bitch slap edition | Main | Atheist rock hard »


Jim V.

So how is the following incorrect:

After 9/11, the Right blamed Islam for it and put Bush in a position where he could basically have authority to do whatever he wanted.

You got like 450 on the verbal SAT, right?


Uh, so Islam had nothing to do with 9/11? U complain whenever I call you conspiratorial, then you prove yourself to be just as irrational.

There's no reading between the lines here. Ellison said, and you apparently agree, that 9/11 was caused by the right in order to grant Bush extraordinary powers. Lame enough that the Hitler comparison is thrown about so casually.

Jim V.

You wrote: "Ellison said...9/11 was caused by the right in order to grant Bush extraordinary powers."

That is complete mischaracterization of what Ellison said.

Marinus van der Lubbe, a communist, did set the Reichstad fire and Mohammad Atta did crashed his plaine into the World Trade Center. The analogy is that both Hitler and Bush expoited those events to revoke civil liberties and increase their power.

Do you really not believe that Bush has exploited 9/11?

Do you believe that those who believe Bush exploited 9/11 and point it out are conspiracy theorists?

But of course you don't follow right wing talking points:

I find it convenient that you all take the (probably incorrect) theory that Hitler staged the Reichstad fire and state it as historical fact.


I interpreted the comments as they were made; I'll let you dissemninate. Ellison's agenda was clear, and if you don't see it you're blind. Of course Bush has exploited 9/11 -- that doesn't mean he made it happen. Per usual, extremists dominate the debate, as you've proven yet again.

Jim V.

Everyone who disagrees with you is an extremist.


Obfuscate all you want -- your intentions sre clear.

Jim V.

Ok...I'll bite. What do you imagine my intentions to be?


im bored

Jim V.

I'm not.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

My blogs


Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 03/2006